Deliverance

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2012 Here is the article confirming that Bush cheated in the debates(not that this will change any peoples opinion, these individuals still voted for him after he lied to go to war).

My favorite excerpts:

"At that point, Dr. Robert M. Nelson, a 30-year Jet Propulsion Laboratory veteran who works on photo imaging for NASA’s various space probes and currently is part of a photo enhancement team for the Cassini Saturn space probe, entered the picture. Nelson recounts that after seeing the Salon story on the bulge, professional curiosity prompted him to apply his skills at photo enhancement to a digital image he took from a videotape of the first debate. He says that when he saw the results of his efforts, which clearly revealed a significant T-shaped object in the middle of Bush’s back and a wire running up and over his shoulder, he realized it was an important story."

"...Jim Atkinson, an owner of a spyware and debugging company in Gloucester, Mass., called Granite Island Group.
'The Times reporters called me a number of times on this story,' confirms Atkinson. 'I was able to identify the object Nelson highlighted definitively as a magnetic cueing device that uses a wire yoke around the neck to communicate with a hidden earpiece—the kind of thing that is used routinely now by music performers, actors, reporters—and by politicians.'"

"Revkin, for one, wished it had run. Here’s what he told me in an e-mail message: 'But personally, I think that Nelson’s assertions did rise above the level of garden-variety speculation, mainly because of who he is. Here was a veteran government scientist, whose decades-long career revolves around interpreting imagery like features of Mars, who decided to say very publicly that, without reservation, he was convinced there was something under a president’s jacket when the White House said there was nothing. He essentially put his hard-won reputation utterly on the line (not to mention his job) in doing so and certainly with little prospect that he might gain something as a result—except, as he put it, his preserved integrity.'"

So do invididuals label people and things "Conspiracy theories" or "conspiracy theorists" because:
a. They have looked at all the facts and concluded that the assertions are theory.
b. They are afraid of what it might mean
c. They believe (sub-consciously) that if they didn't catch it, someone couldn't have gotten one by them. They don't want to believe they were tricked in a way, because it implies they were stupid(similar to cog d).
d. ignorance is bliss
e. they're double agents masquerding as objective when they're in on it(for the truly paranoid)

I don't know i'm just wondering why they call people who saw the earpiece on Bush conspiracy theorists. Why don't they call people conspiracy theorists who think Kerry shot a young vietcong or got a medal for a splinter.
It seems it only works when the ideas are young(trying to gain acceptance) and outside the bounded political mainstream.

I mean the history channel now tells people about the aircraft carriers being moved out of pearl harbor before the bombing. Before that was conspiracy theory.

The history channel shows ample evidence of a second shooter in JFK's assasination.

Will the history books tell of our secret war in Iran, the highest echelon of our intelligence letting 911 happen, or the fact that torture was a policy approved by Rumsfeld?

-Jimothy J. Jones

Was Bush wired with an earpiece in Debate 1? Who was he linked up with? the Brain Karl Rove?

Many individuals noticed (respectively) that Bush had an awkward way of speaking, he paused before answering, he even remarked "let me finish" when there was no disturbance, and the most convincing piece of evidence is the picture of Bush's back (who was wearing a suit which is far to big for him, even though he gets them specially made at this one tailor who is incredibly expensive[i'll get the link it was in the New Yorker]) this picture of his back shows a strangely shaped bulge near the center top of his back. For those who think it some sort of microphone, the debate contract specifies that no microphones are allowed to be brought by individuals. It is also shaped so that it eliminates the posssibility that it is body armor. I will be researching this for the next few days, help me find the smoking gun, the blogosphere is lighting up with speculations. We need to investigate some hard facts and we need to create such a movment online that the mainstream media cannot ignore the evidence. Also remember that the original contract said that the cameras could not even show reaction shots or the backs of candidates(for bald spots), but these demands were ignored which probably made it harder to hide the bullshit. Also if you read mass media articles about how Bush prepped for the debate he did not spend time really at all prepping.

There is also testimony form an individual who says he watched a broadcast of Bush on French television and noticed he was recieving messages and repeating them.
BUSH IS A PUPPET, NOW IS OUR CHANCE TO PROVE IT TO EVERYONE.

Here are the links:
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/298647.shtml

Here is the site with the picture: http://www.bluelemur.com/index.php?p=321

http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=3562

http://www.isbushwired.com

http://theyknew.diaryland.com/041003_98.html

http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/

http://talkleft.com/new_archives/008118.html

http://rense.com/general58/prompt.htm

http://crossroads.net/a/2004/10/01/debate_reaction/index.php

http://www.cosmiciguana.com/archives/002979.html

http://rense.com/general35/voices.htm

http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/10/1697371.php

http://ebradlee10.dailykos.com/story/2004/6/9/122728/8176