Well first we start off with one assumption: Since Carl Bernstein (a more credible reporter than most because of his role in breaking Watergate) published The CIA and the Media Which I cannot find a complete version of ANYWHERE online if anyone could help me out that would be fuckin’ awesome. Anyway he publishes this in Rolling Stone in the late 70s. Now if individuals had listened to the truth he tried to spread there may have been a little movement to clean house. We may have seen a few more media outlets asking questions about CIA connections, we may have seen congress do an investigation, and maybe we would have put a little accountability on the unaccountable intelligence apparatus. Instead this article was “conspiracy theory” and so we can only assume one thing (which I will do for the purposes of this entry) and that is that it has only gotten worse since this was published. Couple more cites: 1 2 3 4 5
Alright so we understand that the Cocaine Importation Agency has journalists “embedded” with real journalists. Now we should take a quick look at the people behind the agents. Now the CIA does not control all media if that is your understanding of this writing then just stop reading I don’t want you here. Mainstream media sources can have their message broadcast the world over….multiple times! Hundreds of times! How about 7 days a week, 24 hours a day! With such a massive propaganda machine one can inculcate billions, and quickly! Now the CIA does not control all media if that is your understanding of this writing then just stop reading I don’t want you here. So who runs these massive propaganda disseminators? Well it turns out that the airwaves are public and every so often they are licensed for use to a third party. This is where the institutions of corporations come in to play. We all understand that corporations are legally a person thanks to the Santa Clara decision. So these legal persons decide what they will pay people to scream about all day. Now what is the nature of a corporation you ask? The answer is that Corporations are driven by profit, they are in fact required by law to seek profit no matter what the other costs, and the only growth that matters is growth in profit. So what propaganda will this corporation disseminate? The answer is any type that will help the bottom line.
The major controllers of what is termed “mainstream media”(MSM) are people…people that we call corporations. So under that assumption we will look at what I like to call the “collective conscious”. This idea is different from the Jungian version that generally states that we are all just pieces of a shattered mirror that was once a single object. Instead this refers to the general sense of organized and top-down truth. They can use their power to criticize actual truth, some thought is deemed radical and other thought is deemed “conspiracy theory”. By either marginalizing the truth or condemning the truth as paranoid insanity the MSM manages to maintain its’ position as arbiter of the collective conscious. For example: a majority of United Statesians thought 911 was linked to Saddam. This was not solely because of corporations this was also a concentrated effort by the white house and pentagon, which the MSM helped disseminate because it benefits them. (Anyone have the listing of correspondence to War machines? like GE owns CBS or something I can’t remember exactly so I don’t want to write it, somebody help me out?)
At least at a site like this that is centered on research and discussion we all understand that Saddam had NOTHING to do with 911. In fact the “Al-Qaeda/CIAduh/muslim brotherhood” in Iraq fights against Saddam. They would kill saddam if given half a chance because he was a self-proclaimed secular socialist. So how did people come to believe that the truth was: “Saddam had a hand in 911”? Rice’s quote and the MSM’s constant dissemination.
So how do we fight against it?
(The following may be perceived as an advertisement, but I don’t receive shit from them. I just want to let others know about a tool that helps me)
Google Desktop This shit does two things without plugins:1. Indexes your hard drive so you can google search it fucking instantaneously2. Provides you with scrolling articles similar to RSS feeds. As you tell the program to “not show articles like this” (which I did to hundreds of sports “journalism” articles).
It reminded me of chatter. I saw hundreds of articles on Iran recently. So it allows us to observe and come to conclusions about where this massive crypto fascist machine is headed next. As “Chatter” increases about Iran we know that they are trying to build public support for a war in Iran.
The thing that truly scares me is that a terrorist attack will be stages by our government to catalyze public support for war with Iran. The reason I see this as plausible is because people are starting to wizen up about Iraq and realizing its not all “liberation” and being greeted with flowers. As public opinion shifts on Iraq it will be harder to rally support for Iran. Thus making a terrorist attack a prerequisite for invasion.
One word of advice: Do NOT have google desktop on while you’re working. It spits hundreds of great articles at you, you’ll end up under a stack of 50 articles, but you’ll have a grin from ear to ear. (Political junkies only)
So my suggestion is some people should grab the program and start monitoring AL CIAduh Chatter. Then post on GNN about what you think. We may think we’re journalists, but I think many of us are more skilled at being media watchdogs.
Central meme:Carl Bernstein, “The CIA and the media How America’s most powerful news media worked hand in glove with the central intelligence agency and why the church committee covered it up” Rolling stone October 20, 1977 1
Showing posts with label freedom of speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom of speech. Show all posts
Sunday, December 03, 2006
HIllary Clinton is a fascist Bitch
I hereby vow to not vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2008 election. I will donate and actively support Howard Dean for the Democratic nomination and vote for him if he receives it in the 2008 elections.
Well Joe Lieberman must have given up, because Hillary had to start picking up the slack. guess what america???????
CARTOONS ARE HAVING SEX….........AND ON YOUR WATCH!!!!
First of all, yes I do like video games, yes they do kick ass, yes they are entertaining, yes they do waste time, but what the fuck you think you’re doin now reading this pile o’ shit.
GTA san andreas came out for xbox. I dig it, its hiliarious, you listen to the radio on that and the storyline half the stinkin’ game is ripping on the military, cops, and CIA. The combat gameplay has also been exponentially improved above GTA and vice city. So its one of the few things(that won’t alter consciousness) that I’ll pay 50$ for. So I rent it first on my freinds account, i’m playing it and all of a sudden I see on the news. There is “latent” content in the disc. All you need is a modded x-box or a modded ps2(no mods for PC) and you can “unlock” this content. Since the content is actually on the disk the game has its rating changed to (fucked if I know some mindfuck/doublespeak/newspeak restricted rating[that means the gov’t has to save you from yourself]). So the next day I make a run to a temple of consumerism and ask for it. “Nope they took it off the shelf when the rating changed”. Every fucking store in the city took it off the shelves. So my freind told the clerk that we rented the game from, that we lost the game and they’d have to charge him for it.
Now Hillary Clinton has picked up Lieberman’s crusade(you may know Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman as the people named most likely to have a lovechild named Barry Goldwater). Now this game is so dangerous for children “Think of the children sob sob this will warp their fragile minds*sob sob*”. In the meantime we’re firing depleted uranium bullets all over Iraq, ‘bout to drop tactical nukes on Iran, and creating torture camps for muslims. If anything will fuck these kids minds its growing up in a country that they tell you stands for peace and freedom, while killing and incarcerating everything that is different. Many others want to take a step further and actually ban the game. I think they should also ban catcher in the rye with it, i mean do you know the word FUCK is in that book!!????gasp I feel so dirty.
I mean I don’t even have a mod, mods cost like 100 bucks or some stupid shit. I don’t even want a mod I will NEVER SEE THIS LATENT CONTENT! But I still have to be protected from this obviously harmful content.
But thats not the point, the point has been around for over 200 years, its called the bill of rights. The first 10 amendments to the constitution. Now you may have forgetton 7, 8, 9, or 10. I mean they’re all the way at the end of the Bill of Rights, but even if you gave up reading the bill of rights i’m sure you got through the first few senetences. If you did: The amendment i’m talking about, ITS THE FIRST ONE! It says there is complete freedom of speech and press to express your opinion/mind. Well tell me how this “video game” doesn’t qualify for that and i’ll stop being angry at poor HIllary.
The other point is Art. Video games are art they are created by people from nothing, to entertain and make people laugh, think, relax, blah blah blah.
So these two cartoons having sex(there was an article in Rolling stone that has the pictures[which are hilarious]). So now the m4s blasting through pig’s heads and blowing up civilians stopped at red lights, the molotov’s in to homes, the harrier jet shooting missiles at civilians, or sneaking up on innocent pedestrians and slitting their fucking throat. These all pale in comparison to the image of 2 cartoons having intercourse.
Now If I want the game, I have to walk past the curtain in to the back room. As I scan movie titles, i always think out loud. “all anal, men on men, hardcore fucking, loads on faces, hoagie slapping, more anal, all lesbians, group sex orgies, oh! There it is GTA san andreas, right where it should be, inbetween Double anal double vaginal and the gay male hatefucking chronicles part 1 through 5”
Fuck you Hillary, you lost one person scared enough of Neo-cons to compromise, but not that much. Few years from now when you want to change the rating on the bible or some other dumb shit you let me know, because I love a good fire(i’ll bring the ‘mallows, Hillary will bring the crackers, and Guy Montag will bring the chocolate bars).
Well Joe Lieberman must have given up, because Hillary had to start picking up the slack. guess what america???????
CARTOONS ARE HAVING SEX….........AND ON YOUR WATCH!!!!
First of all, yes I do like video games, yes they do kick ass, yes they are entertaining, yes they do waste time, but what the fuck you think you’re doin now reading this pile o’ shit.
GTA san andreas came out for xbox. I dig it, its hiliarious, you listen to the radio on that and the storyline half the stinkin’ game is ripping on the military, cops, and CIA. The combat gameplay has also been exponentially improved above GTA and vice city. So its one of the few things(that won’t alter consciousness) that I’ll pay 50$ for. So I rent it first on my freinds account, i’m playing it and all of a sudden I see on the news. There is “latent” content in the disc. All you need is a modded x-box or a modded ps2(no mods for PC) and you can “unlock” this content. Since the content is actually on the disk the game has its rating changed to (fucked if I know some mindfuck/doublespeak/newspeak restricted rating[that means the gov’t has to save you from yourself]). So the next day I make a run to a temple of consumerism and ask for it. “Nope they took it off the shelf when the rating changed”. Every fucking store in the city took it off the shelves. So my freind told the clerk that we rented the game from, that we lost the game and they’d have to charge him for it.
Now Hillary Clinton has picked up Lieberman’s crusade(you may know Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman as the people named most likely to have a lovechild named Barry Goldwater). Now this game is so dangerous for children “Think of the children sob sob this will warp their fragile minds*sob sob*”. In the meantime we’re firing depleted uranium bullets all over Iraq, ‘bout to drop tactical nukes on Iran, and creating torture camps for muslims. If anything will fuck these kids minds its growing up in a country that they tell you stands for peace and freedom, while killing and incarcerating everything that is different. Many others want to take a step further and actually ban the game. I think they should also ban catcher in the rye with it, i mean do you know the word FUCK is in that book!!????gasp I feel so dirty.
I mean I don’t even have a mod, mods cost like 100 bucks or some stupid shit. I don’t even want a mod I will NEVER SEE THIS LATENT CONTENT! But I still have to be protected from this obviously harmful content.
But thats not the point, the point has been around for over 200 years, its called the bill of rights. The first 10 amendments to the constitution. Now you may have forgetton 7, 8, 9, or 10. I mean they’re all the way at the end of the Bill of Rights, but even if you gave up reading the bill of rights i’m sure you got through the first few senetences. If you did: The amendment i’m talking about, ITS THE FIRST ONE! It says there is complete freedom of speech and press to express your opinion/mind. Well tell me how this “video game” doesn’t qualify for that and i’ll stop being angry at poor HIllary.
The other point is Art. Video games are art they are created by people from nothing, to entertain and make people laugh, think, relax, blah blah blah.
So these two cartoons having sex(there was an article in Rolling stone that has the pictures[which are hilarious]). So now the m4s blasting through pig’s heads and blowing up civilians stopped at red lights, the molotov’s in to homes, the harrier jet shooting missiles at civilians, or sneaking up on innocent pedestrians and slitting their fucking throat. These all pale in comparison to the image of 2 cartoons having intercourse.
Now If I want the game, I have to walk past the curtain in to the back room. As I scan movie titles, i always think out loud. “all anal, men on men, hardcore fucking, loads on faces, hoagie slapping, more anal, all lesbians, group sex orgies, oh! There it is GTA san andreas, right where it should be, inbetween Double anal double vaginal and the gay male hatefucking chronicles part 1 through 5”
Fuck you Hillary, you lost one person scared enough of Neo-cons to compromise, but not that much. Few years from now when you want to change the rating on the bible or some other dumb shit you let me know, because I love a good fire(i’ll bring the ‘mallows, Hillary will bring the crackers, and Guy Montag will bring the chocolate bars).
Fuck Violent Protestors
I was reading this shitheads blog where he starts saying he supports people fighting with cops at protests. Fuck the dumb shit.
Fact:Protests are needed because without the peoples voice a democracy will not know what to do, leaving us with at best an ineffective government and at worst a totalitarian government.Fact:we are guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble and the right to freedom of speech. We are wronged illegally if either of these rights are violated.
Assumption: Some people believe that violence is a morally sound option at a peaceful protest.
There are Three situations where violence at a non-violent protest is merited: 1. Self-defense, at many time self-defense is needed to save your own life/to save your body from permanent damage.
2. Defense of others: a freind, a relative, or just some person being put to death by the domestic security forces may need defense.
3.Freedom of speech/assembly: Other times at a peaceful protest the police will illegally block off a road, protestors willing to break the law may be needed to break this down to let the rest of the protest through. Sometimes while attempting to remove barriers to protests violence is needed.
What happens when individuals react with violence at a peaceful assembly, when violence is not merited:1. Cops start shoting their rubberbullets at you and slamming you with the military grade tear gas. Of course none of it hits you, its just everyone around you. You bring pain and suffering upon individuals who wanted nothing but to express their opinion.
2.It provides negative press reaction, because they LOVE the clips of those “students/commies/anarchists” starting shit. You need to make the pigs look like the assholes(think lunch counter sit-ins) which is not that hard if you don’t react with violence when violence is not merited. Negative press reaction destroys the effect of all protest to share “what’s goin’ on” with the entire world.
IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR PEERS BEATEN DON’T START STUPID SHIT.
rebuttals:1. “Cops beat the shit out of protestors no matter what, why do I care if I bring beatings to the people around me?”-ok, lets assume cops beat the shit out of protestors at 100% of protests. Inciting violence when it is not merited will make cops either aggravated or embarrassed. If the cops are aggravated or embarrassed in any way is it not logical to assume they will cause more pain and suffering to these individuals who just want to express their opinion peacefully?
2. “Try taking pepper spray to the face and not get pissed off, or see someone you love get hosed and beaten. You’ll want to stick the fucker”-Watch those lunch counter sit-ins, see them get beaten around and they didn’t do shit. You expose who the real animal is, and its not the people the news labeled as radicals.
3.”The violent protestors get more press then the packaged less-passionate protestors will ever get”-Remember who coined the term “There is no such thing as bad publicity. His name was Richard Milhous Nixon.
The moral of the story: Next time you see the empty bottle pick it up and throw it, in a recycling bin instead of into the line of soldiers of the status-quo.
Moral of the story for sensible people who don’t react with violence when it is not merited: Next time you see the guy pickin’ up a bludgeon of scrap metal and cocking back to throw it. Encircle his forearm with your hand and just ask “why?”. He knows its just going to hurt someone whos going to want retribution, which only means excess pain and suffering for his peers.
Final words:Protests either should be completely non-violent, or should have seperate entities of peaceful and violent natures. We saw some of this at the RNC and the uninaguration. The violent protestors travel together(away from the peaceful protestors) where they are needed to destroy roadblocks or defend peaceful protestors being killed. You personally wanna tussle with cops, well then break some traffic laws and the first one that shows up start shooting, I don’t give a fuck, thats YOUR ass. The minute you put other people’s (unwilling)asses on the line with your violence thats when I say “Fuck You!”
Disclaimer:In no way would I like to downplay the moral repugnancy of law enforcement when it comes to allowing peaceful protests. No matter what you do young guerrilla you’ll still never be as bad as the pigs that are brainwashed in to thinking that they’re still fighting the cold war and we’re communists (or they’re fighting the war on terrorism and we’re all John Walker Lindhs). They are still far worse for spraying kids, females, and the elderly with their fucking pepper spray. As well as bludgeoning the same people within inches of death, many times completely unprovoked.
Far too many of you so-called “anarchists” sound more like little totalitarians, willing to bring pain and suffering upon others for your own dreams to be realized.
Fact:Protests are needed because without the peoples voice a democracy will not know what to do, leaving us with at best an ineffective government and at worst a totalitarian government.Fact:we are guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble and the right to freedom of speech. We are wronged illegally if either of these rights are violated.
Assumption: Some people believe that violence is a morally sound option at a peaceful protest.
There are Three situations where violence at a non-violent protest is merited: 1. Self-defense, at many time self-defense is needed to save your own life/to save your body from permanent damage.
2. Defense of others: a freind, a relative, or just some person being put to death by the domestic security forces may need defense.
3.Freedom of speech/assembly: Other times at a peaceful protest the police will illegally block off a road, protestors willing to break the law may be needed to break this down to let the rest of the protest through. Sometimes while attempting to remove barriers to protests violence is needed.
What happens when individuals react with violence at a peaceful assembly, when violence is not merited:1. Cops start shoting their rubberbullets at you and slamming you with the military grade tear gas. Of course none of it hits you, its just everyone around you. You bring pain and suffering upon individuals who wanted nothing but to express their opinion.
2.It provides negative press reaction, because they LOVE the clips of those “students/commies/anarchists” starting shit. You need to make the pigs look like the assholes(think lunch counter sit-ins) which is not that hard if you don’t react with violence when violence is not merited. Negative press reaction destroys the effect of all protest to share “what’s goin’ on” with the entire world.
IF YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR PEERS BEATEN DON’T START STUPID SHIT.
rebuttals:1. “Cops beat the shit out of protestors no matter what, why do I care if I bring beatings to the people around me?”-ok, lets assume cops beat the shit out of protestors at 100% of protests. Inciting violence when it is not merited will make cops either aggravated or embarrassed. If the cops are aggravated or embarrassed in any way is it not logical to assume they will cause more pain and suffering to these individuals who just want to express their opinion peacefully?
2. “Try taking pepper spray to the face and not get pissed off, or see someone you love get hosed and beaten. You’ll want to stick the fucker”-Watch those lunch counter sit-ins, see them get beaten around and they didn’t do shit. You expose who the real animal is, and its not the people the news labeled as radicals.
3.”The violent protestors get more press then the packaged less-passionate protestors will ever get”-Remember who coined the term “There is no such thing as bad publicity. His name was Richard Milhous Nixon.
The moral of the story: Next time you see the empty bottle pick it up and throw it, in a recycling bin instead of into the line of soldiers of the status-quo.
Moral of the story for sensible people who don’t react with violence when it is not merited: Next time you see the guy pickin’ up a bludgeon of scrap metal and cocking back to throw it. Encircle his forearm with your hand and just ask “why?”. He knows its just going to hurt someone whos going to want retribution, which only means excess pain and suffering for his peers.
Final words:Protests either should be completely non-violent, or should have seperate entities of peaceful and violent natures. We saw some of this at the RNC and the uninaguration. The violent protestors travel together(away from the peaceful protestors) where they are needed to destroy roadblocks or defend peaceful protestors being killed. You personally wanna tussle with cops, well then break some traffic laws and the first one that shows up start shooting, I don’t give a fuck, thats YOUR ass. The minute you put other people’s (unwilling)asses on the line with your violence thats when I say “Fuck You!”
Disclaimer:In no way would I like to downplay the moral repugnancy of law enforcement when it comes to allowing peaceful protests. No matter what you do young guerrilla you’ll still never be as bad as the pigs that are brainwashed in to thinking that they’re still fighting the cold war and we’re communists (or they’re fighting the war on terrorism and we’re all John Walker Lindhs). They are still far worse for spraying kids, females, and the elderly with their fucking pepper spray. As well as bludgeoning the same people within inches of death, many times completely unprovoked.
Far too many of you so-called “anarchists” sound more like little totalitarians, willing to bring pain and suffering upon others for your own dreams to be realized.
Thursday, July 29, 2004
Marketing....or Politics?
Well I was watching Fox news for a laugh humming "Believe it or not iiiiiiii'm walkin on air.........believe it or not its just meeeee" thinking about President Bush in his flightsuit. Then here comes footage of Bush campaigning on the taxpayer's dime(because Enron is in shambles). The *raise two fingers on each hand*"Journalist" was saying "President Bush has said that he will fight for truth, justice, and the American way." My freind turns to me and says "Its like hes a superhero or something." Thats right no substance Truth. Justice. The American Way. This does not mean anything, these are the three symbols this man has chosen to hide behind.
Don't get me wrong Democrats do the same damn thing, its just that well...Karl Rove seriously pushes the envelope. The flightsuit thing was so weird and then Murdoch's New York Post is printing pictures of Kerry in some kind of weird safety suit and compare it to Dukakis in a tank. The only real comparison to Dukakis in a tank is Bush's crazy flightsuit thing.
This also comes to mind because I saw Sean Hannity at the DNC calling the whole thing propaganda and Public relations ploys. I was always thinking about the Newspeak and how the ruling class always says the opposite of whatever its doing if its bad and always accuses the opposition of being guilty of its' own bullshit. So maybe we looked at this from ideological distant viewpoints and ended up with the reverse impression which is hilarious, but seriously the Karl Rove argument from before....... that trumps just about all you got Hannity(See book: "Bush's Brain"). I mean seriously.....Karl Rove is a really dirty manipulator.
Ok so theres this thing called freedom of speech, without it democracy can't work. The problem is social psychology has advanced to the point that marketing has become an effort at mind control(to a degree). Which can only mean that this trend will most likely continue. We have to beware of certain social psychology ploys, so that we can build an aversion to mind control. This is important, because as the reality around us is converted to billboard space, we will need focus our minds to retain sanity. It reminds me of this Philip K. Dick short story called "Sales Pitch". This person in the not so distant future is depressed and losing touch with reality, because of the bombardment of advertisements. The final straw comes when a servant robot comes to their house, the robots job is to sell itself for use. The protaganist is very similar to most of Dick's other protagonists, just a guy trying to get by, but riding a wave of confluent forces. This archetype is simliar to the Western democratic citizen. We are told we have so much freedom and this belief makes it harder for us to understand that we may be capable of evil.
I saw "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's war on journalism" an amazing movie. You know those liberals and their complaining about fighting a war under false pretenses(wake up supporters of imperalism). I recalled O'Reilly comparing Michael Moore to Goebells(spelling?). That is the exact newspeak i'm talking about. A man that advocated the death of all Iraqi citizens(in a show calling them savages and suggesting we level the whole country with bombs) and insists on portraying himself as a patriot while brainwashing our country in to sending their children to die for a "yet to be named" cause.
Ok here is a play 1 act.
Starring: Unwitting Imperialist and Jaded Cynic
JC: so why did we go to war with Iraq?>
UI: Weapons of mass destruction of course. we couldn't wait for "the smoking gun to come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
Jc: So we didn't find those WMDs. Why did we go to war with Iraq now?
UI: To remove a brutal dictator of course. He used chemical weapons on his own people!
Jc: Didn't the US provide him with the equiptment to manufacture chemical weapons? Didn't the US support Saddam before and after he used those chemical weapons? In fact didn't we send Rumsfeld over and he shook hands with the asshole?
UI: He went over there to decry Saddam's use of chemical weapons, to insinuate it had anything to do with trade and realpolitik is preposterous.
Jc: Ok so even if the United States didn't put Saddam in power, ever since he was first hired as an assassin and he couldnt' even hit the right guy and killed the driver all the way up until the point he invaded Kuwait and offered the US a share of the booty. Lets say hypothetically he wasn't even put in power by Reagan/Bush 41 and the Rumsfeld/Cheney/Kissinger crowd. Alright there are many other problems in the world why Iraq?
UI: He was BRUTAL DICTATOR! We had to remove him!
JC: SO WHY ARE WE STILL THERE!!!!????
UI: Well.......thats because there has been a vacuum of power created and to leave now would mean more deaths in the future.
Jc: So you're telling me we had to go in there because he was a direct threat to us.........but we can't leave because taking him out of power creatd a direct threat to us!!!????
UI: No, no, its not our fault, just like the chemical weapons and our support for the perpetuation and escalation of the Iran-Iraq war. ........................................................................................................................Wait we did do all this shit didn't we? This is the most combat deaths since Vietnam isn't it? Why are we still there???
Jc: was there ever an exit strategy???
UI: We have to leave when democracy is put in place.
JC: So as we use a totalitarian military state to impose democracy. As we stay in Iraq because taking the man out of power that was the reason for the attack creates a larger threat than was there orginally. In order to have our freedoms we must begin to give them up(indefinite detentions, patriot act, "free-speech zones", and right to equal representation). We are on opposite ideological ends, because you can either believe the language or you can question it.
Did you truly believe that Iran, Iraq, and North Korea posed such a unique(compared to the many years before) and imminent threat that Bush had to mention these individuals in his state of the union address as 'the axis of evil' ??
UI: No I think anyone would have seen that as a little overboard. A three front war!! hahah wow no one could eve win that.
JC: What do you call Afghanistan, Iraq, and now the cause ramping up war for Iran?
UI: I've read in the newspaper articles that put the phrase 9/11 and juxtapose it alongside Iran, pure and simple manipulative psychological propaganda. You will forget where you heard the information from, but you will recall 9/11 and Iran in the same thought process as you think about recent articles containing either one of these subject matters.
JC: So essentially we're on the same side here, because Bush wants to reinstate the draft in 2005 and take us to war with Iran?
UI: Yah you think I was gonna vote for the guy who will kill me? ahahah, no no I just think Iraq was a good idea.
Ok so that was weak but i'm gonna post it anyway, because i'm tired. No more complacence and our problems will be solved. Let people know you are liberal and a democrat, the contemporary pop culture is similar to the red scare, artists who speak out are blacklisted and the character assasination by Rupert Murdoch's bitches begins. As much as Republicans want to we cannot return to Plessy v. Ferguson(sorry trent, strom, and helms, but Jim brown shoulda handled your ancestors). We cannot return to 1953 Nixon is dead and good riddance, Reagan is dead, but the assholes behind Iran-Contra are still in the Bush administration. I hope to see justice done in my lifetime.
Just think: Bush's actions are from a man who pretends to believe he will be eternally punished for using his life to enact evil. How can he believe that and at the same time indiscriminately kill civilians with bombs(the same way those assholes did us on 9/11) and send so many American soldiers either to death............. or insanity, because of ordering them to torture and rape other human beings.
We all should have took a step back on 9/12 and realized how much it hurts our nation to see so many civilians killed in an indiscriminate fashion. We then could have built a consensus to structure our foreign policy around helping developing nations rather than bombing their civilians or funding coups and death squads. The only way out of the path we have taken may be a drastic change.
Our Forefathers bestowed a duty upon us.
We are to protect the republic through force if neccesary.
If the government becomes tyrannical we are bound by our duty for country to revolt.
The trend of centralizing power within the executive branch and unilateral foreign policy is facist in nature. The use of nationalist symbols to bring about cognitive dissonance in the general public. We are being lulled in to a false sense of complacency while world war three is starting.
All Muslims and All Christians are my brothers and sisters, people of all religions and people of no religions. There is no need for us to fight a global crusade for Britain's three Cs: Commerce, Civilization, and Christianity.
If we help their countries develop their populace will become educated and will learn that democracy is a form of government that is meant to check oppression. The only way we can provide this example is if we set ourselves on the path towards demoracy.
http://www.marchofdeath.com
-Jimothy J. Jones
The conservatives of this country were more shocked by Michael Moore portraying the administration in a negative light than by our country committing horrible violations of the geneva conventions in Abu Ghraib. RUMSFELD ADMITTED TO CERTAIN FORMS OF TORTURE WHICH EXPLICITLY VIOLATE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS!!!! I love my country but at this point in time I hate my government. If the government were to dissolve tomorrow I would celebrate for my brothers and sisters being tortured and raped in Abu Ghraib. I would celebrate for the individuals incarcerated for victimless crimes just to drive the incarceration rate to feed the prison industrial complex.
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
Don't get me wrong Democrats do the same damn thing, its just that well...Karl Rove seriously pushes the envelope. The flightsuit thing was so weird and then Murdoch's New York Post is printing pictures of Kerry in some kind of weird safety suit and compare it to Dukakis in a tank. The only real comparison to Dukakis in a tank is Bush's crazy flightsuit thing.
This also comes to mind because I saw Sean Hannity at the DNC calling the whole thing propaganda and Public relations ploys. I was always thinking about the Newspeak and how the ruling class always says the opposite of whatever its doing if its bad and always accuses the opposition of being guilty of its' own bullshit. So maybe we looked at this from ideological distant viewpoints and ended up with the reverse impression which is hilarious, but seriously the Karl Rove argument from before....... that trumps just about all you got Hannity(See book: "Bush's Brain"). I mean seriously.....Karl Rove is a really dirty manipulator.
Ok so theres this thing called freedom of speech, without it democracy can't work. The problem is social psychology has advanced to the point that marketing has become an effort at mind control(to a degree). Which can only mean that this trend will most likely continue. We have to beware of certain social psychology ploys, so that we can build an aversion to mind control. This is important, because as the reality around us is converted to billboard space, we will need focus our minds to retain sanity. It reminds me of this Philip K. Dick short story called "Sales Pitch". This person in the not so distant future is depressed and losing touch with reality, because of the bombardment of advertisements. The final straw comes when a servant robot comes to their house, the robots job is to sell itself for use. The protaganist is very similar to most of Dick's other protagonists, just a guy trying to get by, but riding a wave of confluent forces. This archetype is simliar to the Western democratic citizen. We are told we have so much freedom and this belief makes it harder for us to understand that we may be capable of evil.
I saw "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's war on journalism" an amazing movie. You know those liberals and their complaining about fighting a war under false pretenses(wake up supporters of imperalism). I recalled O'Reilly comparing Michael Moore to Goebells(spelling?). That is the exact newspeak i'm talking about. A man that advocated the death of all Iraqi citizens(in a show calling them savages and suggesting we level the whole country with bombs) and insists on portraying himself as a patriot while brainwashing our country in to sending their children to die for a "yet to be named" cause.
Ok here is a play 1 act.
Starring: Unwitting Imperialist and Jaded Cynic
JC: so why did we go to war with Iraq?>
UI: Weapons of mass destruction of course. we couldn't wait for "the smoking gun to come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
Jc: So we didn't find those WMDs. Why did we go to war with Iraq now?
UI: To remove a brutal dictator of course. He used chemical weapons on his own people!
Jc: Didn't the US provide him with the equiptment to manufacture chemical weapons? Didn't the US support Saddam before and after he used those chemical weapons? In fact didn't we send Rumsfeld over and he shook hands with the asshole?
UI: He went over there to decry Saddam's use of chemical weapons, to insinuate it had anything to do with trade and realpolitik is preposterous.
Jc: Ok so even if the United States didn't put Saddam in power, ever since he was first hired as an assassin and he couldnt' even hit the right guy and killed the driver all the way up until the point he invaded Kuwait and offered the US a share of the booty. Lets say hypothetically he wasn't even put in power by Reagan/Bush 41 and the Rumsfeld/Cheney/Kissinger crowd. Alright there are many other problems in the world why Iraq?
UI: He was BRUTAL DICTATOR! We had to remove him!
JC: SO WHY ARE WE STILL THERE!!!!????
UI: Well.......thats because there has been a vacuum of power created and to leave now would mean more deaths in the future.
Jc: So you're telling me we had to go in there because he was a direct threat to us.........but we can't leave because taking him out of power creatd a direct threat to us!!!????
UI: No, no, its not our fault, just like the chemical weapons and our support for the perpetuation and escalation of the Iran-Iraq war. ........................................................................................................................Wait we did do all this shit didn't we? This is the most combat deaths since Vietnam isn't it? Why are we still there???
Jc: was there ever an exit strategy???
UI: We have to leave when democracy is put in place.
JC: So as we use a totalitarian military state to impose democracy. As we stay in Iraq because taking the man out of power that was the reason for the attack creates a larger threat than was there orginally. In order to have our freedoms we must begin to give them up(indefinite detentions, patriot act, "free-speech zones", and right to equal representation). We are on opposite ideological ends, because you can either believe the language or you can question it.
Did you truly believe that Iran, Iraq, and North Korea posed such a unique(compared to the many years before) and imminent threat that Bush had to mention these individuals in his state of the union address as 'the axis of evil' ??
UI: No I think anyone would have seen that as a little overboard. A three front war!! hahah wow no one could eve win that.
JC: What do you call Afghanistan, Iraq, and now the cause ramping up war for Iran?
UI: I've read in the newspaper articles that put the phrase 9/11 and juxtapose it alongside Iran, pure and simple manipulative psychological propaganda. You will forget where you heard the information from, but you will recall 9/11 and Iran in the same thought process as you think about recent articles containing either one of these subject matters.
JC: So essentially we're on the same side here, because Bush wants to reinstate the draft in 2005 and take us to war with Iran?
UI: Yah you think I was gonna vote for the guy who will kill me? ahahah, no no I just think Iraq was a good idea.
Ok so that was weak but i'm gonna post it anyway, because i'm tired. No more complacence and our problems will be solved. Let people know you are liberal and a democrat, the contemporary pop culture is similar to the red scare, artists who speak out are blacklisted and the character assasination by Rupert Murdoch's bitches begins. As much as Republicans want to we cannot return to Plessy v. Ferguson(sorry trent, strom, and helms, but Jim brown shoulda handled your ancestors). We cannot return to 1953 Nixon is dead and good riddance, Reagan is dead, but the assholes behind Iran-Contra are still in the Bush administration. I hope to see justice done in my lifetime.
Just think: Bush's actions are from a man who pretends to believe he will be eternally punished for using his life to enact evil. How can he believe that and at the same time indiscriminately kill civilians with bombs(the same way those assholes did us on 9/11) and send so many American soldiers either to death............. or insanity, because of ordering them to torture and rape other human beings.
We all should have took a step back on 9/12 and realized how much it hurts our nation to see so many civilians killed in an indiscriminate fashion. We then could have built a consensus to structure our foreign policy around helping developing nations rather than bombing their civilians or funding coups and death squads. The only way out of the path we have taken may be a drastic change.
Our Forefathers bestowed a duty upon us.
We are to protect the republic through force if neccesary.
If the government becomes tyrannical we are bound by our duty for country to revolt.
The trend of centralizing power within the executive branch and unilateral foreign policy is facist in nature. The use of nationalist symbols to bring about cognitive dissonance in the general public. We are being lulled in to a false sense of complacency while world war three is starting.
All Muslims and All Christians are my brothers and sisters, people of all religions and people of no religions. There is no need for us to fight a global crusade for Britain's three Cs: Commerce, Civilization, and Christianity.
If we help their countries develop their populace will become educated and will learn that democracy is a form of government that is meant to check oppression. The only way we can provide this example is if we set ourselves on the path towards demoracy.
http://www.marchofdeath.com
-Jimothy J. Jones
The conservatives of this country were more shocked by Michael Moore portraying the administration in a negative light than by our country committing horrible violations of the geneva conventions in Abu Ghraib. RUMSFELD ADMITTED TO CERTAIN FORMS OF TORTURE WHICH EXPLICITLY VIOLATE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS!!!! I love my country but at this point in time I hate my government. If the government were to dissolve tomorrow I would celebrate for my brothers and sisters being tortured and raped in Abu Ghraib. I would celebrate for the individuals incarcerated for victimless crimes just to drive the incarceration rate to feed the prison industrial complex.
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
you are just a cog in the steamrolling machine of imperalism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)